Grade |
Rank |
A- |
1 |
Subcategories | Grade
|
Rank
|
Campaign Disclosure Law | A
|
1
|
Electronic Filing Program | A+
|
1
|
Disclosure Content Accessibility | A+
|
1
|
Online Contextual & Technical Usability | C-
|
8
|
Grading
Process Subcategory
Weighting
Methodology
Glossary
The State of Disclosure in Washington Washington has the best campaign finance disclosure program in the country. With an overall grade of an A-, there are some minor improvements that can be made to the program, particularly in web site usability. Nonetheless, Washington's program is a good model for other states to follow. Washington's far-reaching campaign disclosure law ranked number one in the study. The state requires candidates to file monthly reports year-round, and two additional reports before each election. Candidates disclose information about contributors who give more than $25, including occupation and employer for contributions greater than $100. Last-minute contributions of $1,000 or more must be reported by the donor within 24 hours and the candidate within 48 hours. Expenditures of $50 or more must be disclosed and subvendor information is required. Independent expenditures of $1,000 or more occurring within 21 days of an election have to be reported within 24 hours; otherwise independent expenditures must be disclosed within five days of being made. Washington mandates electronic filing for any candidate that reaches a threshold of $25,000 and provides campaigns with free filing software and technical assistance. Washington does an excellent job of making campaign finance data accessible to the public — it received an A+ in this section of the criteria. The state fulfills requests for paper copies of campaign finance records the same day an order is placed and charges a very reasonable price of ten cents per page. It is also possible for the public to obtain campaign finance records on CD-Rom or Zip disk for ten dollars or less depending on the format requested. Campaign finance reports are posted to the web site as soon as they are received and are a combination of scanned-in and electronically filed documents. The site features contribution and expenditure databases of electronically filed records that are searchable across multiple fields. The
contextual information on Washington's web site is also
good, but there is room for improvement in this category. The
state provides an overview of campaign financing trends, explains
campaign finance restrictions, describes which reports are and
are not on the web site, and posts both original filings and amended
reports. The site could be improved with the inclusion of
reporting periods in the indexes of a candidate's reports and in
the reports themselves. In addition, some of the terminology
on the site could be clearer, particularly the titles of the web
site sections. Washington provides a subject index on the
state homepage, which is an excellent feature to help members
of the public locate the Public Disclosure Commission's site,
and contributes to good overall technical usability.
|
Back to the Grading State Disclosure home page
View another state's summary:
This page was first published on September 17, 2003 | Last updated on September 17, 2003
copyright © Campaign Disclosure Project. All rights reserved.