The
quality of campaign disclosure across the
country improved in most states, even in
some that received very low grades. Forty-three
states (86%) made at least one improvement
in campaign finance disclosure practices. Seven
states - Arizona, Connecticut, Mississippi,
Montana, New Jersey, Wisconsin, and Wyoming – made
no measurable improvements in the 2004 study
(although New Jersey made some improvements
that will be reflected in next year’s
grade.)
Washington
state received the highest grade, an A,
while California ranked second overall, with
an A-. Six states received grades
in the B range; thirteen states received grades
in the C range, and twelve states received
grades in the D range. Seventeen states received
failing grades. (See the attached charts for
a complete listing of grades and ranks.)
The most improved states were: Tennessee,
with a seemingly insignificant grade change
from an F to a D, but a very impressive gain
in rank from 46th to 27th; Georgia, with a
grade change from a D+ to a B, and an improvement
in rank from 21st to 4th; California, with
a grade change from a C to an A- and a change
in rank from 9th to 2nd; Indiana, with a change
in grade from a D- to a C-, and a change in
rank from 32nd to 17th; and Florida, with a
change in grade from a C to a B+ and an improvement
in rank from 7th to 3rd.
The
top-ranking states overall are: Washington
(A); California (A-); Florida (B+); Georgia
(B); Illinois (B); Michigan (B); Rhode Island
and Ohio (B-, tied for 7th); Texas (C+); and
Alaska and Kentucky (C+, tied for 10th).
The
lowest-ranking states (all of which received
an F), in rank order from 41 to 50, are: Nevada;
New Hampshire; Montana; North Dakota; New Mexico
and Vermont (tied for 45th); Alabama; South
Dakota; South Carolina; and Wyoming
|